←

Paper 2: Non-fiction and transactional writing

Text 1

Text 1: from a report on a school's 'phone-free' policy (2025, written for this paper) When Greystone Academy banned mobile phones from the start of the school day to the final bell, staff braced themselves for a revolt. Instead, after a difficult first fortnight, something unexpected happened: the noise came back. 'Break times used to be silent,' says deputy head Marcus Reid. 'Two hundred teenagers in the canteen, every one of them staring at a screen. Now they're playing cards, arguing about football, actually talking to each other.' The figures are striking. Incidents of online bullying reported to staff fell by 40% in the first term. Teachers report fewer distractions in lessons, and the library — once a quiet refuge — has started running a lunchtime chess club with a waiting list. Not everyone is convinced. Some parents complain that they cannot contact their children in an emergency, although the school office will pass on messages. A group of Year 11 students launched a petition arguing that phones help them to organise revision and manage anxiety. 'We're nearly adults,' one student wrote. 'We should be trusted to use them sensibly.' Mr Reid is sympathetic, but unmoved. 'We're not anti-technology,' he says. 'We use laptops in lessons all the time. But a phone in your pocket is a door that never closes. For seven hours a day, we've closed it.'

Text 2

Text 2: from a newspaper column, 'The tyranny of the mobile' (1998, written for this paper) I was on a train to Leeds last week when the man opposite me answered his telephone. Not a telephone on the wall, you understand, nor one in a kiosk, but one he had carried in his jacket pocket like a packet of mints. 'Hello? Yes, I'm on the train,' he announced, at a volume suited to a cattle market. For the next forty minutes the entire carriage learned about his difficulties with a supplier in Wakefield, his opinion of his brother-in-law and the precise time he expected to be home for his tea. We are told these devices are the future. Soon, apparently, everyone will have one; children will carry them to school, and nobody will ever be out of reach again. The salesmen say this as if it were good news. I am not so sure. There is a particular kind of peace in being unreachable — on a walk, on a train, in a queue — that I suspect we will not miss until it is gone. When every moment can be interrupted, I wonder whether we will ever again give our whole attention to anything at all. My fellow passenger, I noticed, did not look out of the window once.

Text 1

Text 1: from a report on a school's 'phone-free' policy (2025, written for this paper) When Greystone Academy banned mobile phones from the start of the school day to the final bell, staff braced themselves for a revolt. Instead, after a difficult first fortnight, something unexpected happened: the noise came back. 'Break times used to be silent,' says deputy head Marcus Reid. 'Two hundred teenagers in the canteen, every one of them staring at a screen. Now they're playing cards, arguing about football, actually talking to each other.' The figures are striking. Incidents of online bullying reported to staff fell by 40% in the first term. Teachers report fewer distractions in lessons, and the library — once a quiet refuge — has started running a lunchtime chess club with a waiting list. Not everyone is convinced. Some parents complain that they cannot contact their children in an emergency, although the school office will pass on messages. A group of Year 11 students launched a petition arguing that phones help them to organise revision and manage anxiety. 'We're nearly adults,' one student wrote. 'We should be trusted to use them sensibly.' Mr Reid is sympathetic, but unmoved. 'We're not anti-technology,' he says. 'We use laptops in lessons all the time. But a phone in your pocket is a door that never closes. For seven hours a day, we've closed it.'
11 mark
From Text 1, identify the percentage fall in reported online bullying.
22 marks
From Text 1, give two ways in which break times changed after the ban.
315 marks
Analyse how the writer of Text 1 uses language and structure to interest and engage readers. Support your views with detailed reference to the text.

Text 2

Text 2: from a newspaper column, 'The tyranny of the mobile' (1998, written for this paper) I was on a train to Leeds last week when the man opposite me answered his telephone. Not a telephone on the wall, you understand, nor one in a kiosk, but one he had carried in his jacket pocket like a packet of mints. 'Hello? Yes, I'm on the train,' he announced, at a volume suited to a cattle market. For the next forty minutes the entire carriage learned about his difficulties with a supplier in Wakefield, his opinion of his brother-in-law and the precise time he expected to be home for his tea. We are told these devices are the future. Soon, apparently, everyone will have one; children will carry them to school, and nobody will ever be out of reach again. The salesmen say this as if it were good news. I am not so sure. There is a particular kind of peace in being unreachable — on a walk, on a train, in a queue — that I suspect we will not miss until it is gone. When every moment can be interrupted, I wonder whether we will ever again give our whole attention to anything at all. My fellow passenger, I noticed, did not look out of the window once.
41 mark
From Text 2, identify where the writer was travelling to.
52 marks
From Text 2, explain two things the writer thinks will happen as mobile phones become common.
615 marks
In Text 2, the writer attempts to persuade readers that being always contactable is not a good thing. Evaluate how successfully this is achieved. Support your views with detailed reference to the text.
7(a)6 marks
The two texts show attitudes to mobile phones. What similarities are there between the views of the writers? Use evidence from both texts.
7(b)14 marks
Compare how the writers of Text 1 and Text 2 present their ideas and perspectives about mobile phones. Support your answer with detailed reference to the texts.
840 marks
Write an article for your school or college website in which you argue for or against a complete ban on mobile phones in schools. (24 marks for content and organisation, 16 marks for technical accuracy)

Finished?

Answer every question to finish (9 left), or finish when the time’s up.

Score 0 / 96 · 0 of 9 marked

This paper is written by Plasmo in the style of the Edexcel GCSE English Language exam. It is not a past paper and is not produced or endorsed by the exam board.

Edexcel GCSE English Language Mock Exam: Paper 2: Non-fiction and transactional writing | Plasmo